Look who is sleeping

You are on break and looking through a client's pictures on their smart phone. Your client snapped a picture of your team sleeping on the job. What is your responsibly in this situation?

I hate my agency!

Your team goes on and on about the interpreting agency that placed you both on your current job. You share a few choice experiences you have had with the agency.

+Was it really appropriate to dis on your agency?
+What would have been another option?
+How can you be empathetic to your team while still remaining loyal to your agency?

Been there, terped that

You interpret for a college class with a team. The professor tends to repeat himself, saying the same concept over and over. You play with the various ways the professor explains concepts interpreting one concept in different ways. After one concept has been discussed at length, your client looks down to text and you decide not to interpret the last sentence of the thoroughly debated concept. After all, client isn’t looking and the information was already provided. Your team feeds you your un-interpreted sentence.

--Do you go ahead and interpret the fed sentence?
--Do you ignore your team's feed?
--Do you say, I've got it?

I teach too!

You are subbing for a college level math class. Your team starts as she is in the class every day. While interpreting, you notice she is adding quite a bit of background information about math. Finally she stops interpreting the teacher's lesson and gives the student a private teaching lesson. Then she turns to you and signs, "I used to be a math teacher. And because I can explain this in a better way, I feel I'm within the bounds of ethical interpreting. After all, the most important thing is for the student to understand the information."

+How do you respond?
+When you are on, do you interpret? Or do you teach?
+Do you tell the agency anything?
+Do you talk to your team?

My Ex Sucks!

At the end of your assignment your team offers you a ride home. Thankful not to have to wait for public transportation or call someone for a ride, you accept. On the drive home, your team voices her frustration regarding her impending divorce. Her ex-husband is also an interpreter. You're not super good friends with either of them, but are "facebook friends" with both.

Do you:
+smile and nod. You don't want to get in the middle of it.
+readily take her side. She is offering you a ride home.
+tell her you'd rather not know. You may have to work with her ex one day.

+What are the short term ramifications of your decision?
+If you will want a ride from her again but don't want to be drug into her personal saga, how will you avoid the topic of her ex?
+How can you remain supportive but still distanced?

Coffee or Science?

You interpret in a high school on-going. During earth science you have a team as the material is difficult and the teacher lectures the entire period. Yet today—and about once a week—the students copy questions from the board and work on their own. Your team suggests, since neither of you are “working” you go out to buy your much needed coffee.

*Is it ok to leave during your scheduled interpreting time? Its possible you return the favor next week. And you’ll be back well before the next period.

*What are the professional consequences?

*What are the short and long term consequences?

*What pattern are you establishing for other interpreters in your high school?

You interpret, with a team, a 4-hour, college level economics class. The professor's accent is difficult to understand so you and your team rely on each other quite a bit. One day, your team arrives hungry and suggests that instead of teaming 20/20, today you should team 30/30 so she has time to go get a bite to eat.

Keep in mind:

• You enjoy working with your team an up to this point have had no issues.
• You are concerned about interpreting accurately because of the professor's accent coupled with the heavy content.
• You are hungry and wouldn't mind a 30 minute break to grab a bite.

What are your ethical concerns?

• Would you agree to the 30/30 split? If so, why? If no, why not?
• What Codes of Professional Conduct would you keep in mind?
• How will you continue a working relationship with your team?
  

Assigning Sign Names to Unsuspecting Acquaintances

You are interpreting in a university with an on-going client and an on-going team. Midway through the semester you, your team and your client are comfortable enough with each other to banter back and forth. You discuss superfluous happenings in your own lives so its not a stretch to, during a break, discuss class events including the personalities in the classroom. Your team says, "I don't like the annoying girl who always raises her hand" and then "I can't believe that guy brings his politics into the classroom. Ugh." (insert eye roll here.) You chime in with a couple of your own choice comments.

Class resumes; your team is 'on'. Professor asks a question and the girl you were all talking about raises her hand. Your team signs, "Annoying girl says... ." You see your client chuckle. Then the guy you were recently talking about raises his hand. Your team signs, "Politician says... ." You feel a knot in your stomach but when you are on you continue with those apt but assumptive sign names.

+What is the ethical conflict?
+What is the Code of Professional Conduct the interpreters should be keeping in mind?
+What should you do?
+What are the consequences of your decision?