A place to discuss real life ethical dilemmas to better your decision making process as an interpreter.
Showing posts with label CPC 2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPC 2. Show all posts
Sunday, August 26, 2012
You are interpreting at a job training center. You are shadowing your client while another student teachers her a job. Your client works extremely slow. The other student is doing 3/4 of the work. Do you have any responsibility to say something like, "if you want to continue with this training, you need to pick it up a bit."
Friday, August 24, 2012
Re-interpretation
Your client is preparing to take a hands on test. The instructor explains what needs to be done for prep then walks off. The Deaf client asks you to repeat what was said. So you re-interpret from memory what the instructor said. The instructor walks back and gives you a look that says, "what?" you realize it looks like you are assisting the Deaf client, perhaps helping them cheat.
--what would you do next time to avoid the appearance of cheating?
--if you weren't done with your initial interpretation--perhaps the client needed a lot of expansion--how could you keep the instructor there?
--what are your options?
--what would you do next time to avoid the appearance of cheating?
--if you weren't done with your initial interpretation--perhaps the client needed a lot of expansion--how could you keep the instructor there?
--what are your options?
Labels:
CPC 2,
CPC1,
CPC3,
CPC6,
explaining role,
respect,
respect for consumer,
role
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Let me show you
You are interpreting in English class. Your kids are to silently read a poem on birch trees. The poem is set up in one tall skinny stanza with words close together and tiny font.
Your student signs, "I can't read this. I don't get it.".
You ask, "have you ever seen a bitch tree before?"
Your student replies no. You look around and the teacher is busy with other students so you google on your smart phone: birch tree images. You show your student a few pictures of birch tree forests. Your student signs, "now I get it."
Were you right to search for clarifying images? Is that part of getting the message across or is it over stepping your role?
Your student signs, "I can't read this. I don't get it.".
You ask, "have you ever seen a bitch tree before?"
Your student replies no. You look around and the teacher is busy with other students so you google on your smart phone: birch tree images. You show your student a few pictures of birch tree forests. Your student signs, "now I get it."
Were you right to search for clarifying images? Is that part of getting the message across or is it over stepping your role?
Labels:
boundaries,
client/interpreter relationship,
CPC 2,
CPC 4,
CPC3,
CPC4,
high school,
k-12,
role
Friday, July 13, 2012
Are you ready?
It's a dry spell and you want work. You are cold called by a random agency you've never heard of asking if you can work tomorrow at 9am. "yes!", you think but hold your cool enough to ask, "until when?"
The agency replies, "depositions usually last a couple of hours."
Deposition=law. Your certified but not with a law specialty.
--you accept the job anyhow because it's all interpreting anyhow.
--you accept because although you aren't certified with law, you are qualified.
--you turn it down because your not qualified and kick yourself for being unprepared for an opportunity
--you turn it down but give the agency the name of another interpreter who is qualified and certified.
The agency replies, "depositions usually last a couple of hours."
Deposition=law. Your certified but not with a law specialty.
--you accept the job anyhow because it's all interpreting anyhow.
--you accept because although you aren't certified with law, you are qualified.
--you turn it down because your not qualified and kick yourself for being unprepared for an opportunity
--you turn it down but give the agency the name of another interpreter who is qualified and certified.
Labels:
accepting work,
CPC 2,
declining work,
legal,
limits,
professional setting,
role
Saturday, June 16, 2012
It's a heliocentric world out there
On a state test you are interpreting a question with the key word "heliocentric". Do you sign "sun center" perhaps giving away the answer, or do you fingerspell the word because they should know that vocabulary anyhow?
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I'm only trying to help
We've discussed the dilemmas around teachers leaving classrooms. Suppose, now, you arrive to your class and your regular chair is missing. While you are securing an empty desk, the teacher leaves to find you a chair. Is the situation different since the teacher is trying to help you?
Labels:
boundaries,
client/interpreter relationship,
CPC 2,
CPC3,
high school,
k-12,
role
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Calculus chaos
The teacher in this high school calculus class leaves the room. You are the lone adult in a sea of bored and unruly teens. One jumps out of his seat and closes the door behind the teacher, hoping it will lock behind her and she can't get back in. He the turns to you and says, "I was in my seat the whole time, Miss. Right?"
You know your supposed to follow the teacher out of a classroom but when she left you were interpreting an explanation and was surprised by the teacher's sudden departure.
List everything wrong with this situation.
What are things you can do to prevent such a situation from reoccurring.
If you can't prevent this situation, what options do you have for dealing with it, for making ethical decisions while in this situation.
You know your supposed to follow the teacher out of a classroom but when she left you were interpreting an explanation and was surprised by the teacher's sudden departure.
List everything wrong with this situation.
What are things you can do to prevent such a situation from reoccurring.
If you can't prevent this situation, what options do you have for dealing with it, for making ethical decisions while in this situation.
Labels:
boundaries,
confidentiality,
CPC 2,
CPC1,
CPC6,
educational team,
high school,
k-12,
role
Friday, April 27, 2012
How about a poem to me?
Your students are assigned to write a poem praising something. After you interpret the assignment, you suggest writing about your favorite interpreter--you! (me!)--in jest, of course.
Is that overstepping boundaries? Or is that relationship building?
Would it be different depending on the age if the client? (elementary vs high school vs college)
When would this kind if banter be acceptable or not?
Is that overstepping boundaries? Or is that relationship building?
Would it be different depending on the age if the client? (elementary vs high school vs college)
When would this kind if banter be acceptable or not?
Labels:
boundaries,
client/interpreter relationship,
college,
CPC 2,
CPC 4,
CPC3,
CPC4,
high school,
k-12,
personal question,
respect,
respect for consumer,
role
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Excuse me, please
An alarm on your cell phone goes off while you are the "on" interpreter. The entire class, including the teacher, looks at you. Of course you have to reach into your bag and turn off the phone. Your client asks what happened.
How do you remedy the situation.
How do you prevent this from happening again?
How do you remedy the situation.
How do you prevent this from happening again?
Labels:
boundaries,
CPC 2,
CPC6,
explaining role,
respect for consumer,
role
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Keep your opinion out of it.
You are interpreting in a drug rehab program. You are interpreting a movie (no captions!! Ug!!) which you find to be overtly simple and preachy. You make a face. As soon as you do, you see your client respond...to your face and then respond differently to the movie.
--what are your options to now erase your opinion from the conversation?
--suppose you hear, a week later, your client quit the program. Are you partly responsible?
--what are your options to now erase your opinion from the conversation?
--suppose you hear, a week later, your client quit the program. Are you partly responsible?
Labels:
boundaries,
client/interpreter relationship,
community interpreting,
CPC 2,
CPC 4,
CPC3,
CPC4,
CPC6,
respect,
respect for consumer,
role
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
No phones!
Electronics aren't allowed in school. The students are putting together a dance and the dance teacher, not bring able to go against school policy, asks the class, rhetorically, how they will bring in music to practice if they can't bring in an iPod, for example. She says, "I can't allow you to bring it in. ... If your smart, you'll understand what I'm saying.". She was implying that if the students brought an electronic device, she wouldn't stop them. But she couldn't openly say that.
The implication doesn't come through in your interpretation. So you decide to be obvious. "if you bring your iPhone," you interpret, "she's not gonna take it away."
Labels:
boundaries,
CPC 2,
CPC6,
high school,
respect for consumer,
role
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Educational team
A hearing student comments-loudly-that she is planning on cheating on the test tomorrow. You interpret for your student who advises the cheater in her poor idea. But, the teacher never catches on.
Sure enough, the cheater had an answer written on her hand. She shows a number of her peers. Again, the teacher has no idea.
-what is your responsibility? She is hearing, not yours.
-but you are an adult in the room.
Sure enough, the cheater had an answer written on her hand. She shows a number of her peers. Again, the teacher has no idea.
-what is your responsibility? She is hearing, not yours.
-but you are an adult in the room.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Can you relay a message?
Class is over. Your student left. You are packing your bag. The professor comes up to you and asks, "can you tell your student x, y, and z? Please."
You have seen her talk directly to your student before so you conclude she wasn't avoiding your student but just missed them before they left.
Although you consider
1.) telling her you'll have the student talk to her at the beginning of class tomorrow.
2.) saying when you see the student in class, you'll tell them
Instead you say sure. After all, you'll see them again in 15 minutes.
Right? Wrong? Options?
You have seen her talk directly to your student before so you conclude she wasn't avoiding your student but just missed them before they left.
Although you consider
1.) telling her you'll have the student talk to her at the beginning of class tomorrow.
2.) saying when you see the student in class, you'll tell them
Instead you say sure. After all, you'll see them again in 15 minutes.
Right? Wrong? Options?
Labels:
boundaries,
client/interpreter relationship,
CPC 2,
CPC 4,
CPC3,
CPC4,
CPC6,
educational team,
explaining role,
high school,
k-12
Saturday, January 15, 2011
OMG! I've gone viral on You Tube!!!
What do you do if your interpretation of a song is recorded and posted on You Tube? Or, as in this case, you post your final on You Tube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJKA8us6k4k&feature=player_embedded#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJKA8us6k4k&feature=player_embedded#!
- What are the short term consequences?
- What are the long term consequences?
- If everyone did this, how would that effect the interpreting profession?
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Assigning Sign Names to Unsuspecting Acquaintances
You are interpreting in a university with an on-going client and an on-going team. Midway through the semester you, your team and your client are comfortable enough with each other to banter back and forth. You discuss superfluous happenings in your own lives so its not a stretch to, during a break, discuss class events including the personalities in the classroom. Your team says, "I don't like the annoying girl who always raises her hand" and then "I can't believe that guy brings his politics into the classroom. Ugh." (insert eye roll here.) You chime in with a couple of your own choice comments.
Class resumes; your team is 'on'. Professor asks a question and the girl you were all talking about raises her hand. Your team signs, "Annoying girl says... ." You see your client chuckle. Then the guy you were recently talking about raises his hand. Your team signs, "Politician says... ." You feel a knot in your stomach but when you are on you continue with those apt but assumptive sign names.
+What is the ethical conflict?
+What is the Code of Professional Conduct the interpreters should be keeping in mind?
+What should you do?
+What are the consequences of your decision?
Class resumes; your team is 'on'. Professor asks a question and the girl you were all talking about raises her hand. Your team signs, "Annoying girl says... ." You see your client chuckle. Then the guy you were recently talking about raises his hand. Your team signs, "Politician says... ." You feel a knot in your stomach but when you are on you continue with those apt but assumptive sign names.
+What is the ethical conflict?
+What is the Code of Professional Conduct the interpreters should be keeping in mind?
+What should you do?
+What are the consequences of your decision?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)